The question of how we know what we know is a complicated
one, with an entire branch of philosophy, epistemology, devoted to it. The
biggest problem is that there's almost nothing that we can know for certain.
All of our information about the world comes to us through our senses, and we
have no way of knowing if what are senses tell us reflects anything "out there," whether there is an
objectively real world that is reflected in our sense data or if everything we experience
is an illusion.
Descartes illustrated the problem by positing a deceptive
demon who fed him sights, sounds, smells etc. to simulate a reality that
doesn't really exist. Since 1999 The Matrix has been the go-to analogy.
The world experienced by those in the Matrix is a perfect illusion. How can any
of us know if we are in the Matrix? And, since we may be in the Matrix, how can
we know what is real? Or even if there is anything at all?
Descartes found one thing we can be certain of: we each can
be certain of our own existence. If we experience things and think about
things, there must be something doing
the experiencing and thinking. It may be
something completely unlike what we think ourselves to be, something not
remotely human, but there has to be something that is doing the thinking. Descartes
famously summed up this single ontological certainty as, "Cogito, ergo sum," "I think, therefore I am."
But what now? If all we can be certain of is our individual
existence, how do we determine what, if any, of what we experience is real? And
are we justified in making any and all claims about reality, given that all
claims are equally unprovable?
We use the "Well it's what I have to work with" philosophy. I have no way of knowing 100% if the reality I perceive is what's real or if you are all figments of my imagination but I have nothing else to work with so I'll deal with that reality on its terms.
ReplyDelete