Does
anyone else get annoyed by vertlach?
The kind that build complex answers to their questions while ignoring the
mundane straightforward answer, or the type that present some outlandish
behavior as though it were praiseworthy.
There
was a vort i heard years ago - i
don't remember the exact details - that had something to do with bringing bikurim, and how the rich people would
bring their produce on gold and silver trays that they would then take back
afterwards, while the regular people would you use baskets the kohanim then got to keep. The vort made some point about the
superiority common people who, while their presentation wasn't as nice, give
the baskets as well as the bikurim.
The vort was presented as though this was the
reason the people behaved in this way. Yet the whole time, i couldn’t help
but think that the common people probably didn't get the baskets back for the
same reason that when you give someone something in a plastic shopping bag, you
don't expect to get the shopping bag back. In other words, baskets were a very
cheap and ubiquitous container. The answer to why people didn't expect to get
their baskets back is likely entirely mundane, and has nothing at all to do
with the relative merits of the rich and the poor.
Had
the speaker made that point, and then gone on to say that, nonetheless, we can
use this phenomenon to illustrate a lesson, i would have no problem with that.
But that's not how these sorts of things are presented. They're presented as
though the convoluted clever vort is
the reason that the subject of the vort
happened or is done that way.
Another
example that I heard recently:
A speaker
told a story about a rebbe who was
traveling and found himself in a strange town for Shabbos. He had no money with him, and was forced to go to chassid
to ask for money for a place to stay and for food for Shabbos. The chassid happily gave the rebbe some money, and
expected the rebbe to be happy to now have arrangements for Shabbos. Instead, the rebbe gave him a
tepid “Thank you.”
After
Shabbos, the rebbe returned to the
chassid’s house and thanked him profusely. He explained that he had been
overjoyed when the chassid meet arrangements for him for Shabbos, but had wanted to save the joy that he had felt for Shabbos rather than express it at that
moment.
The speaker
treated this story as though it were an amazing example of piety. I was left
wondering what was wrong with the rebbe. This is not a typical reaction. And by
that, I don't mean that it's an unusually praiseworthy one. I mean that this is
not sort of reaction we would expect from a neurotypical person familiar with
interacting with other people. If the story is true, I seriously wonder if the
protagonist was autistic.
The
story also makes several unfounded and probably erroneous assumptions:
1.
That joy is a finite commodity.
2. Expressing
joy diminishes it.
3.
Joy is fungible: it can be saved for later and its focus can be transferred.
One
and two are just wrong. Emotions are not finite commodities. We have an
infinite capacity for any given emotion, and need only something to trigger it.
And the more we expressing emotion, the more we feel it and the longer it
lasts. Three is partly right. Emotions color our experiences, and so it's one
is feeling joyful, that feeling will color all of the experiences they have
while it lasts. But emotions can't be saved for later, nor can their focus be
changed through an act of will.
So
what was presented as an inspiring story of the type of behavior that we should
emulate is more likely a story about an autistic man who struggles to understand
how emotion works.
My
problem is that I can't help but listen when someone is speaking. I think that
for most people, speakers become background noise, and so vertlach don’t bother them. I listen, and I can't help but wonder
what the speakers are thinking. Are these sorts of things really supposed to be
inspiring? Uplifting? Examples of lessons and behaviors to be emulated? Why
don't people think through the implications of these sorts of stories? I know
the point of a vort is really to
provide a bit of uplifting entertainment while showing off how clever the
speaker is, but these examples are not entertaining, uplifting, or clever.
They're insipid, inane, and annoying.
Regarding the rebbe expressing gratitude; my guess is that the rebbe gave an insufficient thank you, the chassid was insulted and complained to someone and that this got back to the rebbe who then made up an excuse.
ReplyDeleteAssuming any of the story is true at all.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehttps://evolvingjew.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-all-for-boss-test.html
ReplyDeleteThe "All for the Boss" test
I just thought of a new test to tell if you're Charedi or Modern Orthodox. It's called the "All for the Boss" test. Read or re-read the popular (in the frum world) 1984 biography of Yaakov Yosef Herman by his daugher Ruchoma Shain.
Inspired? You're Charedi.
Appalled? You're Modern Orthodox or further to the left.
Was he a tremendous machnis oreach?
Or was he a fanatic who had no consideration for his wife, bringing home crowds all the time and expecting her to feed them, working her fingers to the bone?
Was he a tzadik who bravely fought for frumkeit in early 20th century NYC and who cultivated sons and sons in law to be great Torah scholars?
Or was he a fundamentalist who refused to let his very bright 17 year old daughter go off to college and instead married her off almost against her will and sent the young couple off to Poland to learn for a few years?
"The vort made some point about the superiority common people.." Exactly. The idea is make the common people feel important to Judaism, and thus perpetuate the religion.
ReplyDeleteAs someone who is neurodiverse, I found part of this otherwise excellent post ever so slightly offensive: the idea that a non-neurotypical reaction to something is somehow less "praiseworthy". Please remember that this is a spectrum and that these are real things with diagnostic tests, not something that you can just assume about someone from their behaviour, and that people who are autistic can be enabled and many lucky enough to be in a good environment view it as a superpower.
ReplyDelete