Translated text of Mesilas Yesharim in this font.
My
commentary in this font.
CHAPTER I
CONCERNING MAN'S DUTY IN THE WORLD
THE FOUNDATION OF SAINTLINESS and the
root of perfection in the service of God lies in a man's coming to see clearly
and to recognize as a truth the nature of his duty in the world and the end
towards which he should direct his vision and his aspiration in all of his
labors all the days of his life.
Our Sages of blessed memory have taught
us that man was created for the sole purpose of rejoicing in God and deriving
pleasure from the splendor of His Presence; for this is true joy and the
greatest pleasure that can be found.
And
we’re just going to take their word for it?
The place where this joy may truly be
derived is the World to Come, which was expressly created to provide for it;
Funny
then that God never bothered to mention it in the Torah.
but the path to the object of our
desires is this world, as our Sages of blessed memory have said (Avorh 4:21),
"This world is like a corridor to the World to Come."
The means which lead a man to this goal
are the mitzvoth, in relation to which we were commanded by the Lord, may His
Name be blessed. The place of the performance of the mitzvoth is this world
alone.
How
do you know that?
Therefore, man was placed in this world
first - so that by these means, which were provided for him here, he would be
able to reach the place which had been prepared for him, the World to Come,
there to be sated with the goodness which he acquired through them. As our
Sages of blessed memory have said (Eruvin 22a), "Today for their [the
mitzvoth's] performance and tomorrow for receiving their reward."
When you look further into the matter,
you will see that only union with God constitutes true perfection, as King
David said (Psalms 73:28), "But as for me, the nearness of God is my
good," and (Psalms 27:4), "I asked one thing from God; that will I
seek - to dwell in God's house all the days of my life..." For this alone
is the true good, and anything besides this which people deem good is nothing
but emptiness and deceptive worthlessness.
The
prooftext doesn’t say what he wants it to say. It doesn’t follow from that
Dovid saw being close to God as good or that it was all he asked of God that
everything else is “worthless” or even that being close to God is the greatest
good.
For a man to attain this good, it is
certainly fitting that he first labor and persevere in his exertions to acquire
it. That is, he should persevere so as to unite himself with the Blessed One by
means of actions which result in this end. These actions are the mitzvoth.
The Holy One Blessed be He has put man
in a place where the factors which draw him further from the Blessed One are
many. These are the earthy desires which, if he is pulled after them, cause him
to be drawn further from and to depart from the true good.
The
assumption here seems to be that there is an obvious dichotomy between “earthly
desires” and Godliness. This is both a very Christian concept – as opposed to,
say, chassidus, which sees the potential for holiness in everything – and is
just not obvious at all. There’s no logical reason that mitzvos and “desires”
are mutually exclusive. While mitzvos put some restrictions on desires, one can
be a glutton, can spend all his time amassing wealth, even, for a man, can
sleep around (as long as he avoids women married to other men), and he hasn’t
violated any mitzvos.
It is seen, then, that man is veritably
placed in the midst of a raging battle. For all the affairs of the world,
whether for the good or for the bad, are trials to a man: Poverty on the one
hand and wealth on the other, as Solomon said (Proverbs 30:9), "Lest I
become satiated and deny, saying, `Who is God?' or lest I become impoverished
and steal..." Serenity on the one hand and suffering on the other; so that
the battle rages against him to the fore and to the rear. If he is valorous,
and victorious on all sides, he will be the "Whole Man," who will
succeed in uniting himself with his Creator, and he will leave the corridor to
enter into the Palace, to glow in the light of life. To the extent that he has
subdued his evil inclination and his desires, and withdrawn from those factors
which draw him further from the good, and exerted himself to become united with
it, to that extent will he attain it and rejoice in it.
If you look more deeply into the
matter, you will see that the world was created for man's use. In truth, man is
the center of a great balance. For if he is pulled after the world and is drawn
further from his Creator, he is damaged, and he damages the world with him. And
if he rules over himself and unites himself with his Creator, and uses the
world only to aid him in the service of his Creator, he is uplifted and the
world itself is uplifted with him. For all creatures are greatly uplifted when
they serve the "Whole Man," who is sanctified with the holiness of
the Blessed One. It is as our Sages of blessed memory have said in relation to
the light that the Holy One Blessed be He stored away for the righteous
(Chagiga 12a): "When the Holy One Blessed be He saw the light that He had
stored away for the righteous, He rejoiced, as it is said (Proverbs 13:9), `The
light of the righteous rejoices.' " And in relation to the "stones of
the place" that Jacob took and put around his head they said (Chulin 916),
"R. Yitzchak said, `This teaches us that they [the stones] gathered
themselves into one spot, each one saying, "Let the righteous one lay his
head upon me." Our Sages of blessed memory drew our attention to this
principle in Midrash Koheleth, where they said (Koheleth Rabbah 7:28) - 'See
the work of God...' (Ecclesiastes 7:13). When the Holy One Blessed be He
created Adam, He took him and caused him to pass before all the trees of the
Garden of Eden. He said to him, `See how beautiful and praiseworthy are my
works; and all that I have created, I have created for your sake. Take heed
that you do not damage and destroy my world.' "
Argument
from prooftexts. To be fair to the Ramchal, this was the common way of arguing
in his time. But for anyone who doesn’t already accept that the Torah (in the
maximalist sense) is authoritative because it’s the Torah, this isn’t
convincing. As a book to help someone who already accepts the whole framework
to come close to God, the Mesilas Yesharim might work. As a book to give to
people who have “questions”… this is not helpful.
To summarize, a man was created not for
his station in this world, but for his station in the World to Come. It is only
that his station in this world is a means towards his station in the World to
Come, which is the ultimate goal. This accounts for numerous statements of our
Sages of blessed memory, all in a similar vein, likening this world to the
place and time of preparation, and the next world to the place which has been set
aside for rest and for the eating of what has already been prepared. This is
their intent in saying (Avoth 4:21), "This world is similar to a corridor
...," as our Sages of blessed memory have said (Eruvin 22a), "Today
for their performance and tomorrow to receive their reward," "He who
exerted himself on Friday will eat on the Sabbath" (Avodah Zarah 3a),
"This world is like the shore and the World to Come like the sea ..."
(Koheleth Rabbah 1:36), and many other statements along the same lines.
And in truth, no reasoning being can
believe that the purpose of man's creation relates to his station in this
world. For what is a man's life in this world! Who is truly happy and content
in this world?
This
assumes that 1. There is a purpose, and 2. That the purpose involves being
happy and content. Perhaps we’re God’s playthings, and our “purpose” is to live
lives of pain and drama, because He finds that entertaining? True, I have no
particular reason to think that’s the case, but there’s also no particular
reason to think that our “purpose” involves being happy, or to extrapolate from
that unsubstantiated premise to the assertion that “no reasoning being” could
think that this world is an end in itself.
He
should have stuck to prooftexts. His logic here is lousy.
"The days of our life are seventy
years, and, if exceedingly vigorous, eighty years, and their persistence is but
labor and foolishness" (Psalms 90:10). How many different kinds of
suffering, and sicknesses, and pains and burdens! And after all this - death!
Not one in a thousand is to be found to whom the world has yielded a
superabundance of gratifications and true contentment. And even such a one,
though he attain to the age of one hundred years, passes and vanishes from the
world. Furthermore, if man had been created solely for the sake of this world, he
would have had no need of being inspired with a soul so precious and exalted as
to be greater than the angels themselves, especially so in that it derives no
satisfaction whatsoever from all of the pleasures of this world.
How
do you know that there is such a thing as a soul, and if there is, how do you
know its attributes, such as that it derives nothing from this world? And how
do you know that it’s not necessary? We could easily come up with a reason we
need a soul that has nothing to do with any other world. Perhaps a soul really
is the answer to the question of where consciousness comes from, and perhaps
God gave us consciousness to make His soap opera – our world – more entertaining.
That’s no less plausible than what the Ramchal is suggesting, and has the
virtue of not needing to groundlessly speculate about the attributes of a soul
we can’t know anything about.
This is what our Sages of blessed
memory teach us in Midrash (Koheleth Rabbah), "'And also the soul will not
be filled' (Eccelesiastes 6:7) What is this analogous to? To the case of a city
dweller who married a princess. If he brought her all that the world possessed,
it would mean nothing to her, by virtue of her being a king's daughter. So is
it with the soul.
Analogies
are popular in frum (and Jewish – the Ramchal predates frumkeit) thought, but
they’re terrible as arguments. The things being compared in an analogy are not
in fact the same, and so we can’t extrapolate from one side of the analogy to
the other. They’re useful to illustrate a concept, but no more.
If it were to be brought all the
delights of the world, they would be as nothing to it, in view of its
pertaining to the higher elements." And so do our Sages of blessed memory
say (Avoth 4:29), "Against your will were you created, and against your
will were you born." For the soul has no love at all for this world. To
the contrary, it despises it. The Creator, Blessed be His Name, certainly would
never have created something for an end which ran contrary to its nature and
which it despised.
This
argument might have worked in the Ramchal’s time, when people assumed that
animals were unconscious automata that only gave the appearance of emotion.
Today, when we understand that animals do experience pain, this argument no
longer holds. If God created animals, and created them so that some must eat
others, then He does create things for an end which it despises.
Man was created, then, for the sake of
his station in the World to Come. Therefore, this soul was placed in him. For
it befits the soul to serve God; and through it a man may be rewarded in his
place and in his time. And rather than the world's being despicable to the
soul, it is, to the contrary, to be loved and desired by it. This is
self-evident. After recognizing this we will immediately appreciate the
greatness of the obligation that the mitzvoth place upon us and the
preciousness of the Divine service which lies in our hands. For these are the
means which bring us to true perfection, a state which, without them, is
unattainable. It is understood, however, that the attainment of a goal results
only from a consolidation of all the available means employable towards its
attainment, that the nature of a result is determined by the effectiveness and
manner of employment of the means utilized towards its achievement, and that
the slightest differentiation in the means will very noticeably affect the
result to which they give rise upon the fruition of the aforementioned
consolidation. This is self-evident.
It is obvious, then, that we must be
extremely exacting in relation to the mitzvoth and the service of God, just as
the weighers of gold and pearls are exacting because of the preciousness of
these commodities. For their fruits result in true perfection and eternal
wealth, than which nothing is more precious.
We thus derive that the essence of a
man's existence in this world is solely the fulfilling of mitzvoth, the serving
of God and the withstanding of trials, and that the world's pleasures should
serve only the purpose of aiding and assisting him, by way of providing him
with the contentment and peace of mind requisite for the freeing of his heart
for the service which devolves upon him. It is indeed fitting that his every
inclination be towards the Creator, may His Name be blessed, and that his every
action, great or small, be motivated by no purpose other than that of drawing
near to the Blessed One and breaking all the barriers (all the earthy elements
and their concomitants) that stand between him and his Possessor, until he is
pulled towards the Blessed One just as iron to a magnet. Anything that might
possibly be a means to acquiring this closeness, he should pursue and clutch,
and not let go of; and anything which might be considered a deterrent to it, he
should flee as from a fire. As it is stated (Psalms 63:9), "My soul clings
to You; Your right hand sustains me." For a man enters the world only for
this purpose - to achieve this closeness by rescuing his soul from all the
deterrents to it and from all that detracts from it.
After we have recognized the truth of
this principle, and it has become clear to us, we must investigate its details
according to its stages, from beginning to end, as they were arranged by R.
Pinchas ben Yair in the statement which has already been referred to in our
introduction. These stages are: Watchfulness, Zeal, Cleanliness, Separation,
Purity, Saintliness, Humility, Fear of Sin, and Holiness. And now, with the aid
of Heaven, we will explain them one by one.
My ha'aros to your ha'aros
ReplyDelete" Funny then that God never bothered to mention it in the Torah."
See the discussion in Rav Wiederblank's sefer for various answers given to this.
"As a book to give to people who have “questions”… this is not helpful."
Whoever suggested this to you has no idea what he's talking about. It's a mussar sefer not an e
" How do you know that?"
It's a mussar sefer and takes Jewish theology for granted. Objections like this miss the point.
"It doesn’t follow from that Dovid saw being close to God as good or that it was all he asked of God that everything else is “worthless” or even that being close to God is the greatest good. "
The first is probably standard mussar sefer exaggerations. The second is since presumably God can grant dovid whatever he wants dovid would ask for the best stuff.
"for a man, can sleep around (as long as he avoids women married to other men), "
This is wrong. There's many problems (including but not limited to) 1.Niddah 2.Meta-halahic considerations of holiness 3.לֹא־תִהְיֶ֥ה קְדֵשָׁ֖ה מִבְּנ֣וֹת יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל and 4.zera levatala among others.
"The assumption here seems to be that there is an obvious dichotomy between “earthly desires” and Godliness."
Again, mussar sefer exaggerations to drive home the point of how one forgets about Godliness due to mundane physical affairs.
"True, I have no particular reason to think that’s the case, but there’s also no particular reason to think that our “purpose” involves being happy, or to extrapolate from that unsubstantiated premise to the assertion that “no reasoning being” could think that this world is an end in itself."
That the purpose is receiving goodness is vastly more plausible given God's ascribed attributes.
"How do you know that there is such a thing as a soul, and if there is, how do you know its attributes, such as that it derives nothing from this world?"
Presumably because the soul is incorporeal it couldn't directly get hana'ah from corporeal things.
"And how do you know that it’s not necessary?"
He'd say that if the only point of life is to engage in physical routines then there's no need for consciousness i.e a soul.
"If God created animals, and created them so that some must eat others, then He does create things for an end which it despises."
Good point here.
"Whoever suggested this to you has no idea what he's talking about. It's a mussar sefer not an e"
ReplyDeleteThe last two words should be "emunah thesis"